|
Does it have any value today?
There is
plenty of criticism against Phrenology going back to when it was first used.
However, there have been plenty of psychologists and there still are, who
recognise the values that Phrenology has but too often have to work in secret or
risk being ostracised by colleagues.
Some errors
in the diagnosis may occur. They can be attributed to the following causes,
which can easily be recognised: 
Subjective
causes of error; due to errors in the Phrenological interpretation of the skull
-
Incorrect or
incomplete examination of the skull (for example when the observer is misled
by the subject's hairstyle)
-
Insufficient
attention for the interaction between faculties. This is a very common cause
of errors. It is not correct to make a judgment on one single faculty; the
interaction of other faculties must always be taken into account. Example: a
strong Destructiveness does not in itself stand for a violent, aggressive
person; a strong development of Moral faculties may lead this person's
dynamic forces towards higher aspirations.
Objective
causes of error. These are disorders in the brain of the skull that distort
normal development of the brain.
-
Pathological
deformation of skull
-
Brain damage
-
Major
psychological disorders
-
Drug addiction
leading to brain disorders
It would be
wrong to reject Phrenology as such, without first assessing the value of the
science. The Phrenological analysis of personality remains of incomparable value
to assess the character.
In
conclusion, Phrenology has its place in modern times and it can be of benefit
for those willing to work with it. It is not unlike spiritualism in its nature
in that until you have experienced a positive event with it then you are
unlikely to change your view or indeed, have any kind of view as to its worth.
|